Securing the Decentralized Enterprise with Zero Trust Principles

May 21, 2025

In today's hyper-connected world, where remote and hybrid work have become the norm, traditional network security models are struggling to keep up. The once-reliable parameter defined by firewalls and Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) is rapidly dissolving, leaving organizations exposed to an increasingly complex threat landscape. VPNs, though long considered a cornerstone of secure remote access, were never designed for a world where employees, devices and applications operate far beyond the confines of a corporate network. As a result, cyber attackers are finding new ways to exploit the implicit trust VPNs place in users once they're "inside". Enter Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA), a fundamentally different approach that assumes breach by default and verifies every user, device and connection continuously. Rather than extending the network to users, ZTA provides access to specific applications based on strict identity and context-based policies. With industry analysts predicting a steep rise in ZTA adoption over VPNs, it's clear that organizations are seeking smarter, more granular defenses.  

In this article, we'll explore why ZTA is rapidly gaining ground, how it addresses VPN shortcomings, and what it takes to implement a Zero Trust strategy that truly secures the modern enterprise.  

The VPN Dilemma: Outdated and Overwhelmed

VPNs operate on the principle of perimeter-based security, once a user is authenticated, they typically gain broad access to internal network. This model assumes implicit trust for anyone inside the network, which creates a major vulnerability. If an attacker successfully compromises a VPN credential or device, they can often move laterally through the network, access sensitive systems, and exfiltrate data with little resistance.

For decades, firewalls and Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) have served as the foundational components of network security. These tools were built around the concept of perimeter defense: a model that inherently trusts everything inside the network and treats external sources as threats. While this approach was effective in the past, the modern threat landscape has rendered it inadequate.  

Attackers today routinely exploit perimeter-centric weaknesses. Once an intruder bypasses the firewall or gains VPN access - often through stolen credentials or unpatched vulnerabilities, they can move laterally within the network, escalating privileges and accessing sensitive systems undetected. Firewalls, though helpful in blocking unauthorized traffic, cannot prevent lateral movement without complex and expensive segmentation. VPNs, while enabling remote access, fail to verify user intent or monitor behavior after access is granted. These shortcomings make traditional tools ill-suited for a world of cloud computing, remote work, and persistent threats.  

Moreover, vendors often market firewalls and VPNs as components of "Zero Trust" solution. This is misleading. Although these tools can be part of a broader security strategy, they do not constitute Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA) on their own. ZTA demands a fundamental shift, away from perimeter-based trust models to a framework that continuously validates every access request, regardless of source.

Notable Exploited VPN vulnerabilities  

Ivanti

CVE-2025-0282 - A Stack-Based Buffer Overflow Vulnerability in the Ivanti Connect Secure, Policy Secure and ZTA Gateways can result in unauthenticated remote code execution.  

CVE-2025-22457 - A Stack-Based Buffer Overflow Vulnerability in the Ivanti Connect Secure, Policy Secure, and ZTA Gateways enabled a remote unauthenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution.  

Citrix

CVE-2023-3519 - A Code Injection Vulnerability in the Citrix NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway enables unauthenticated remote code execution.

Fortinet

CVE-2023-27997 - A Heap-Based Buffer Overflow Vulnerability in the Fortinet FortiOS and FortiProxy SSL-VPN enables an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute code via specially crafted requests.

The Zero Trust Mindset

As enterprises shift away from legacy remote access solutions like VPNs, the need for a modern security framework that aligns with the distributed nature of today's work environment becomes clear. This is where Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA) enters the picture, not as a replacement for perimeter security, but as a reimagining of how trust, access and verification are handled across the digital ecosystem.  

Rather than relying on static perimeters, ZTA builds security around user identity, device posture, behavior patterns, and context. It enforces access decisions dynamically, ensuring that each request, no matter where it comes from, is continuously evaluated and verified. The goal is to minimize implicit trust and limit exposure across the network.  

At its core, Zero Trust operates on the principle that no user or device should be trusted automatically, even if it resides within the organization's internal network. This shift enables granular access control, reduces the attack surface and strengthens organizational resilience against modern threats like credential abuse, lateral movement, and insider attacks.  

ZTA is structured around several key principles that define its architecture and guide its implementation:  

Principles of Zero Trust Architecture

Components of ZTA

Zero Trust Architecture is anchored in a set of core components that work cohesively to secure every layer of the digital environment. Each component plays a critical role in enforcing least-privilege access, verifying trust continuously, and responding dynamically to emerging threats.

  1. Identity: The foundation of access control
    Identity forms the foundational layer of Zero Trust Architecture. This component includes both human and non-human identities such as service accounts, APIs, and automated agents. Access is determined strictly by verified credentials, contextual signals, and real-time risk assessments. Strong identity governance incorporates multi-factor authentication, single sign-on solutions, identity and access management, and behavioral analytics to detect anomalies. Access is allowed only to identities that are verified and appropriately authorized, significantly reducing the risk of privilege misuse or unauthorized intrusion.    
  1. Devices: Enforcing endpoint trust
    Devices represent potential entry points into an enterprise environment, whether they are laptops, mobile phones, IoT assets, or servers. Zero Trust requires complete visibility into all connecting devices, ensuring they are continuously monitored for compliance, configuration integrity, and vulnerabilities. Real-time inventory management, endpoint detection and response tools, secure configurations, and isolation of compromised devices are essential measures. Device health is constantly evaluated to ensure only trusted and secure endpoints are granted access.  
  1. Networks: Controlling lateral movement
    Networks within Zero Trust are designed with the understanding that traditional perimeters no longer exist. To prevent lateral movement and reduce attack surfaces, networks are segmented into micro-perimeters. Encrypted communications, identity-aware gateways,  continuous traffic inspection, and anomaly detection become standard practices. These controls enable granular policy enforcement and ensure that network access is granted based on context, not location.  
  1. Applications and workloads Securing runtime environments
    Applications and workloads operate in diverse environments, ranging from on-premises systems to cloud-native platforms and containerized services. Zero Trust removes implicit trust between application components, demanding runtime validation of behavior and contextual authorization. Secure development practices, dynamic access controls, automated compliance checks, and monitoring of inter-service communication ensure that applications operate securely and within defined parameters.  
  1. Data: Safeguarding the core asset
    Data is safeguarded throughout its lifecycle, from creation to storage and transmission. Zero Trust enforces end-to-end encryption, data classification, and robust data loss prevention strategies. Access to sensitive information is governed by policy-based controls, with visibility into how data is used, shared, or transferred. These mechanism uphold confidentiality, integrity and resilience against data breaches.  
  1. Visibility and analytics: Enabling continuous awareness
    Visibility and analytics serve as the intelligence layer of Zero Trust, offering real-time insight in to all activities across the environment. Comprehensive log collection, advanced correlation engines, behavior analytics, and forensic capabilities form the foundation for situational awareness. This constant feedback loop enhances security posture by informing adaptive policies and enabling rapid detection of suspicious behavior.  
  1. Automation and Orchestration: Scaling trust enforcement
    Automation and orchestration enable Zero Trust to operate at a scale and respond swiftly to evolving threats. Automated policy engines enforce security measures consistently across all domains. Integration with threat intelligence sources facilitates proactive blocking, while incident response workflows streamline containment and recovery. Orchestrate defense mechanisms also allow compromised systems to self-heal, ensuring operational continuity and reduced dwell time during attacks.  

Working of ZTA

The following steps outline how this model is practically implemented within an organization to strengthen cybersecurity, prevent data breaches, and ensure tighter control over digital assets.

Step 1: Identify and prioritize the protect surface  

The first phase in adopting Zero Trust is to clearly define what needs to be secured. Rather than attempting to apply controls across the entire network, which can be overwhelming and inefficient, organizations should focus on what's known as the 'protect surface'. This includes the most valuable and vulnerable components, typically categorized into four areas:  

Step 2: Enforce traffic controls based on dependencies:  

Understanding how data flows within the environment is crucial to building effective Zero Trust controls. Each application or user request often relies on multiple backend services, especially databases that store sensitive information. Mapping these dependencies helps determine where to place control points such as firewalls, gateways, or proxies.  

Once the dependencies are mapped, traffic controls can be enforced to limit access only to what is absolutely necessary. This reduces the risk of over-privileged access and blocks potential lateral movement across systems.  

Step 3: Design a tailored Zero Trust network

A Zero Trust Network should be built specifically around the protected surface - it is never a universal template. The architecture typically includes tools such as next-generation firewalls (NGFWs) for segmentation and enforcement. These tools create micro-perimeters around high-value assets, ensuring that communication in and out of those segments is tightly controlled.  

In addition to segmentation, multi-factor authentication (MFA) is integrated to strengthen identity verification, requiring users to prove their legitimacy through more than one method before being granted access.  

Step 4: Define policy using contextual rules  

Once the architecture is in place, the next step is to create access policies that are context-aware and tightly scoped. One effective method is the Kipling method, which addresses the following six questions for each access request:  

Step 5: Continuously monitor and optimize  

The final piece of the Zero Trust puzzle involves continuous monitoring of all activity within the environment. This ensures threats are detected early and systems are fine-tuned for performance and security. Key tools and techniques include:

Image representing the process of implementing a Zero Trust Architecture

The Zero Trust Advantage: Why ZTA is the future of enterprise security

Best practices for implementing Zero Trust Architecture

Successfully adopting Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA) requires more than just swapping out legacy systems like VPNs- it demands a strategic, phased approach that aligns with your organization's unique risk profile and operational priorities. Below are key best practices to guide your Zero Trust Journey.  

Prioritize Mission Critical applications

Start by identifying and securing your most valuable and sensitive applications, those that drive core business functions or store critical data. These assets should be the first to receive Zero Trust protections, including identity-based access, encryption, and continuous monitoring. By securing the most vital elements first, you reduce the organization's risk exposure early in the transition.  

Focus on high-risk users and use cases

Users who present a higher risk such as those with elevated privileges, access to sensitive data, or poor security hygiene should be prioritized. This includes individuals who consistently fail phishing simulations or frequently access sensitive systems. Apply strict access control, monitor behavior continuously, and enforce strong authentication methods to limit the potential for insider threats or credentials misuse.  

Ensure consistent policy enforcement across all environments

Zero Trust principles should be uniformly applied, regardless of user location or device type. Whether users are working remotely, on-site, or on the move, policies should enforce the same level of scrutiny. Consistent enforcement across cloud, on-premises, and hybrid environments ensure there are no weak spots for attackers to exploit.  

Invest in user awareness and training  

Technology alone is not enough, users must understand the reasoning behind Zero Trust and their role in maintaining security. Provide ongoing education and training to build awareness about access policies, authentication procedures, and best practices for data handling. Empowering users to act securely reduces the likelihood of human error undermining your Zero Trust efforts.  

Adopt a phased, use-case driven approach

Transitioning to Zero-trust is not an all-at-once shift, its a journey that should be approached incrementally. Begin with well-defined use cases, such as replacing VPN access for remote employees, and scale gradually. This allows your teams to test, refine and adapt policies without overwhelming operations or users.


Virtual Private Network (VPN) vs Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA)

Category VPN ZTA (Zero Trust Architecture)
Security Model Perimeter-based: assumes trust inside the network Never trust, always verify: assumes breach and verifies continuously
Access Control Broad, network-level access Granular, least-privilege access per user, device, and context
Trust Assumption Implicit trust once connected No implicit trust; every request is verified
User Verification Single point-in-time authentication Continuous authentication and authorization
Lateral Movement Risk High as users can move across the network once inside Very low as microsegmentation prevents lateral movement
Application Exposure Entire network potentially exposed Only specific applications and resources are accessible
Device Posture Awareness Limited or absent Enforced, access depends on device health and compliance
Scalability Requires hardware and network provisioning Cloud-native, scalable, and flexible
User Experience Can cause latency and require backhauling traffic Seamless, direct-to-resource access
Deployment Model Appliance-based or endpoint software Software-defined, integrates with cloud and on-prem environments
Cost & Complexity High maintenance, infrastructure-heavy Reduced cost, simplified operations
Threat Detection & Response Limited visibility and delayed response Real-time monitoring, logging, and AI/ML-based threat detection
Support for Hybrid Work Poor as it struggles with distributed access Excellent as it is designed for remote, hybrid, and mobile workforces
Compliance Enablement Basic logging, limited segmentation Strong access control, audit logs, and policy enforcement support compliance

Zero Trust, Infinite Possibilities

Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA) marks a transformative shift in cybersecurity, moving beyond outdated, perimeter-based defenses like VPNs to a model that prioritizes continuous verification, least-privilege access, and contextual awareness. Yes, the shift may demand effort, rethinking workflows, upgrading legacy systems, but the payoff is a future where security is proactive, not reactive. With benefits like seamless remote access, stronger cloud protection, and airtight control over who gets in and what they can do, ZTA isn’t just about reducing risk, it’s about unlocking a new level of operational freedom.  

Sources Cited:

  1. https://www.zscaler.com/blogs/product-insights/why-vpns-and-firewalls-can-t-build-zero-trust-architecture  
  2. https://www.fortinet.com/resources/cyberglossary/how-to-implement-zero-trust  
  3. https://www.sentinelone.com/cybersecurity-101/identity-security/zero-trust-network-access/#need-for-zero-trust-network-access
  4. https://www.informationweek.com/cybersecurity/zero-trust-security-why-it-s-essential-in-today-s-threat-landscape  
  5. https://securitybrief.com.au/story/vpns-are-falling-short-why-it-s-time-to-move-to-zero-trust  
  6. https://nordlayer.com/learn/zero-trust/benefits/#conclusion  
  7. https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/what-is-a-zero-trust-architecture  
  8. https://blog.barracuda.com/2024/07/23/10-essential-steps-for-transitioning-from-vpn-to-zero-trust-acce  

About Loginsoft

For over 20 years, leading companies in Telecom, Cybersecurity, Healthcare, Banking, New Media, and more have come to rely on Loginsoft as a trusted resource for technology talent. From startups, to product and enterprises rely on our services. Whether Onsite, Offsite, or Offshore, we deliver. With a track record of successful partnerships with leading technology companies globally, and specifically in the past 6 years with Cybersecurity product companies, Loginsoft offers a comprehensive range of security offerings, including Software Supply Chain, Vulnerability Management, Threat Intelligence, Cloud Security, Cybersecurity Platform Integrations, creating content packs for Cloud SIEM, Logs onboarding and more. Our commitment to innovation and expertise has positioned us as a trusted player in the cybersecurity space. Loginsoft continues to provide traditional IT services which include Software development & Support, QA automation, Data Science & AI, etc.

Expertise in Integrations with Threat Intelligence and Security Products: Built more than 250+ integrations with leading TIP, SIEM, SOAR, and Ticketing Platforms such as Cortex XSOAR, Anomali, ThreatQ, Splunk, IBM QRadar & Resilient, Microsoft Azure Sentinel, ServiceNow, Swimlane, Siemplify, MISP, Maltego, Cryptocurrency Digital Exchange Platforms, CISCO, Datadog, Symantec, Carbonblack, F5, Fortinet, and so on. Loginsoft is a partner with industry leading technology vendors Palo Alto, Splunk, Elastic, IBM Security, etc.

In addition, Loginsoft offers Research as a service: We're more than just experts in cybersecurity; we're your accredited in-house research team focused on unraveling the complexities of cybersecurity and future technologies. From Application Security to Threat Research, our seasoned professionals have cultivated expertise in every facet of the field. We've earned the trust of over 20 security platform companies, who count on our research and analysis to strengthen their cybersecurity solutions.

Interested to learn more? Let’s start a conversation.

Get notified

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

BLOGS AND RESOURCES

Latest Articles